At 5:01 -0800 1/4/02, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>X-Ray damage is cumulative, so while one or
>two times may not be visible, 3, 4 or more might well be
True. But tests in the UK have repeatedly failed to show any X-ray
damage even on multiple (I think 16 was the max) passes with MODERN
European machines. Maybe someone recalls the details? The Association
of Photographers & British Journal of Photography were involved & the
tests pretty thorough.
My own experience (not shooting delicate tonal work, just reportage)
has been of no problems with modern machines (& successful evasion of
South American film friers).
David Hoffman
--
__________________________________________________________
David Hoffman Photo Library
<>
phone +44 (0)20 8981 5041 fax +44 (0)20 8980 2041
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
