Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: X rays was Digital PIC
I would assume this is dependent upon film speed and if it is pushed or
not. What film speeds do you usually use?
Art
David Hoffman wrote:
> At 5:01 -0800 1/4/02, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
>>X-Ray damage is cumulative, so while one or
>>two times may not be visible, 3, 4 or more might well be
>>
>
> True. But tests in the UK have repeatedly failed to show any X-ray
> damage even on multiple (I think 16 was the max) passes with MODERN
> European machines. Maybe someone recalls the details? The Association
> of Photographers & British Journal of Photography were involved & the
> tests pretty thorough.
>
> My own experience (not shooting delicate tonal work, just reportage)
> has been of no problems with modern machines (& successful evasion of
> South American film friers).
>
> David Hoffman
> --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
