ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography



On 09/06/2007 James L. Sims wrote:
> I think that digital imaging definitely has a place in this list,
> Tony.
> I have confidence in and great respect for the core group of this
> list.
> Digital imaging, film scanning and digicams are still evolving.  Just
> some of the issues are RAW file converters, practical limits of pixel
> density - have we reached it? How much do we really need?  And the
> digital archiving issues, just to name a few.  I think you have a blue
> ribbon group contained in this list, Tony.
>
> Please keep it going,

I am amazed to see it leap back into life, it saves me worrying that the
server has clagged:)

I'm happy to let it mutate to accomodate changed conditions, though I
wouldn't want to see it become a minor and pointless clone of [prodig].

--
Regards

Tony Sleep
http://tonysleep.co.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.