Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
  • From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@gmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 08:53:06 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:07:08 +0100
  • Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=PGJ7YCEjzEhTa2FOF7W4uu4LVqL5kKieW5OWG4kJ1fzWvS7O9/gXFNwcutCVoeJH9H29l8Ef+YCuinkJWYdfbqyK/vjZXtpeGreBO+2tAMjMUYJI77BA7EE1YxcYoHLr9mWSjQNJXylBiy2sm4z7ywsows4ytziWmfOFzt+ukck=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=aeX1BwUOueb9/ckPkCvZoYIJ5KWB/rFCEmCJKWBImIZZVmflpHq/9q9sbB+6JECk2zJuS9ok1Q536YSrNsjJKcoeGOoXveWLH4ZiJfUcuIF02YVKrVN9sxqXpm5FM66hWVRWsHVdjVUHBsszwe7qGG0b+oxdWEnMSmvxlZsaUVo=
  • Envelope-to: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
  • In-reply-to: <466A0110.8010000@knology.net>
  • List-post: <mailto:filmscanners@halftone.co.uk> (No HTML, plain text only)
  • List-subscribe: <mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk> (use 'Subscribe filmscanners@halftone.co.uk')
  • List-unsubscribe: <mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk> (use 'Unsubscribe filmscanners@halftone.co.uk')
  • References: <1181274970-7172.00022.00026-smmsdV2.1.6@smtp.bgsu.edu><466939DE.2090003@halftone.co.uk> <466A0110.8010000@knology.net>

On 6/8/07, James L. Sims <jlsims@knology.net> wrote:
> I agree with you, Tony, Digital cameras, for all practical purposes, has
> surpassed the quality of 35mm format film and I believe that happened
> with the arrival of the six megapixel camera, a few years ago,
> significant cropping, not withstanding - grain being much more forgiving
> than pixelization.

There are pockets of resistance:

http://image66.blogspot.com/

Warning:  no C*non or N*kon images to be found above.

This guy coined the expression "delayed digital capture" for his
scanned stuff (tongue in cheek, I think).  He's a friend, so be kind.
;^)

Joel W.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.