Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Compact Cameras



Hi,

I know this question has been asked in the past (and slightly off-topic) but
times change so I'd thought I'd raise it again.

I recently read an article about a photographer who started out with digital
(Fujifilm S2 Pro) but then switched to medium format for colour and to an
Olympus XA for 35mm black & white.

The latter part caught my eye as I use an XA for its size and portability, 
albeit
with slide film.  I like the XA and its exposure is normally reasonable but
always feel restricted by the lack of manual exposure.  (I often use a hand
held meter with my "proper" cameras.)  Additionally, although I enjoy
occasional scanning - I have a Minolta Scan Elite - it is just too time
consuming.

As a result, I have been seriously considering retiring the XA for one of the
latest generation of 7 megapixel digital compacts like the Canon S70, which
not only has manual controls but can also output in RAW format.

So my question is this: have digital compacts reached the stage yet where
they can give film compacts like the XA a run for their money on image
quality?  I'd be interested in hearing any experiences list members may have
on this.

(I can't really give a print size for a comparison as I don't always print my
slides but the scanner can produce images roughtly 3800 x 2500 pixels and
the XA lens is surprisingly sharp for its size.)



Al Bond

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.