Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digestfor Sun 22 Feb, 2004
Howard Grill wrote:
>Petru...Thanks for your response. I looked at your Black and White sample
>from your website..though I have to admit I looked at it in the web browser
>as opposed to in Photoshop.
>
This comment was about the color photos, so don't worry about it.
> While it looks to me that Neat Image did a nice
>job removing grain it also looked to me like there was also a loss in image
>sharpness in the eyes and hair.
>
That's why I said that this image is not the best of the best. If I
recall, this was the first time I used NeatImage. It is possible to fine
tune the filter settings for "high frequency" (high detail) areas and if
you're careful you can get very good results. For pathological cases I
suppose you could do a selection in Photoshop and apply the NeatImage
filter with different settings on this selection and on the rest of the
image.
>I am not sure if those images were already sharpened or not.
>
No, they weren't.
>What do you think, having printed them?
>
I've only printed it in 8x10". Grain-wise the image looks very smooth.
I believe that you can get a demo version of NeatImage and experiment
with it.
Have fun!
P.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
