[filmscanners] Re: Web images copyright

["Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>]

Actually, I'm not sure that's completely true.  As I recall, there was a
change in the US copyright registration law, or at least a clarification
or interpretation change of it, way back in the late '70's.

It used to read that a collection of work could be copyrighted under one
registration, but the proviso was that the pieces had to be considered a
body of work which had some type of continuity, such as a book of
images, or articles, an exhibit, etc.  There was a change in either the
wording or interpretation made back some time ago, that even a
collection of diverse art, or a grouping that didn't have a specific
theme or purpose could still be registered as a grouping.

Art


LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:

> They always have permitted the bulk colpyrighting of groups of images
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Bernie Kubiak
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:29 AM
> To: laurie@advancenet.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Web images copyright
>
>
> An addition to Art's note:  in the US if you've registered your copyright it
> is much easier to defend it and to get a settlement if the image is stolen.
> My understanding is the copyright office now allows you to register groups
> of images, which saves time and money.
>
> -----------------------------
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body