Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Flattening negatives




----- Original Message -----  
From: <doogle@doogle.com>
To: <box2@mfelsch.de>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 4:28 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Flattening negatives

I agree with nearly everything you say, but one thing is different:

My slide films are (slightly) curved, when developed in a dip- and - dunk- 
processor, 
and they are completely flat, when developed in a big lab with roller 
machines...
I made this experience (and the others regarding scratches and dirt, too :-( ) 
with
several labs of each kind.
I never found a dip- and- dunk- lab that could deliver the films as flat as 
they come
from the roller- processing lab.

Matthias

>Generally, roller transport processors are the worst for everything. They're 
>kept at the maximum
>in control development temps for minimum time span runs (if indeed they are 
>kept "in control" at
>all). They are often "one shot" chemistry feed, rather than replinishment 
>method, and the final
>drying section is simply too hot. And of course they are dirty, prone to junk 
>embedded in
>emulsion and scratching.
>
>If you can find a place that does "dip and dunk" processing you'll be much 
>happier. With E-6,
>they are also the best for tight processing controls, assuming the place keeps 
>a close finger on
>the pulse (which most do, as the machines are generally $50K and up).




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.