ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: 2700ppi a limiting factor in sharpness?




--- Rob Geraghty <harper@wordweb.com> wrote:
> In an
> ideal
> world I might go for Contax or Leica, but I have very limited funds,
> so
> the best choice seems to be get a good lens for the gear I already
> have.

You don't need Leica and Contax lenses to see a difference. Most better
brands have good and low quality lenses. And regarding resolution one
better first invests in a tripod.

Robert

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.