ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: (examples included, ~25kB) exposure influence on noise level for FS4000 working on underexposed slides



Hi,
Here are some examples of exposure influence on noise level for FS4000 working
on underexposed slides.
1.FG_properExposure - the slide was properly exposed so it can be a reference
2.FG_exp0 - underexposed (2stops) slide scanned with FilmGet (exposure auto)
3.FG_exp2 - underexposed (2stops) slide scanned with FilmGet (exposure +2)
4.vuescanLongExposure - underexposed (2stops) slide scanned with Vuescan
(longExposure) 
All scans have corrected gamma in the same manner in order to emphasize details
of dark areas.

We can observe that "FG_exp2" and "FG_properExposure" are  nearly identical.

Regards

Tom


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

Attachment: example.zip
Description: example.zip



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.