Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid



It is better in practice of course, but with a little forethought and
extra work that benefit can be negated.

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: Austin Franklin <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid


>
> > The primary advantage of the Imacon design is the unfolded light
path
> > correct?  The mirrors can't be helping with the less expensive
> > scanners.  Only absolute disadvantage to the straight path
approach is
> > physical size of the scanner(?), and of course, in the case of the
> > Imacon, cost.
>
> Same thing with the Leafscan, it also has a straight light path, no
mirrors.
> Also, one feature of the Imacon is the magnetic curved film holders.
I am
> not sure if it actually is better or not, but it is a feature.
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.