ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans



OK, I scanned some negatives Fuji Super G 100 I had. The scans were more
clear, no comparison with the Fuji NPS, I think. So it must be the
combination of the Film and development by the lab or the way the
scanner reacts to the grain in the film, or both. In both cases I must
look for another 160 ASA film (and I will have other NPS 160 developped
by other labs, and see if that makes a difference).

Thanks for the answers,

Harry


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] Namens Alessandro Pardi
Verzonden: woensdag 11 juni 2003 11:20
Aan: Harry@vdKrogt.nl
Onderwerp: [filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans


Hi Harry,

to rule out the possibility that the problem is the film you can shoot a
test roll of a good 100ASA film: Kodak Supra, Fuji Reala or Superia
should all be so far from the grain (assuming it's grain) you see that
it would be immediately clear whether the problem is in the film or in
the scanner. In the meantime, a major difference between noise and grain
is that noise is
random: so if you use the multiple pass option of Vuescan noise should
be greatly reduced, whereas grain would remain substantially unchanged.

Alessandro

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harry@vdKrogt.nl [mailto:Harry@vdKrogt.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:11
> To: alessandro.pardi@inferentiadnm.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans
>

<snip>

> I am a bit surprised to see that the opinions are so different, grain
> versus noise. What can I do to make a more definite test? Make scans
> at 4000 dpi and put them on the page? That would mean even more
> bandwith.
>
> Harry
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in
the message title or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.