ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans



For people with wideband, "more bandwidth" means nothing. I downloaded
your 3 megabyte file in just a few seconds. 4 times a small number is
still a small number (i.e. going from 2K dpi to 4K dpi).

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
> Harry@vdKrogt.nl
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 AM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans
>
>
> What can I do to make a more definite test? Make scans at
> 4000 dpi and put them on the page? That would mean even more bandwith.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.