ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening



I tried it.  Leaving the "Resample" box checked does result in no change the
ppi Resolution.

Unchecking the "Resample" box does result in a change in Resolution.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
To: <mlidaka@Ameritech.Net>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 7:03 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening


Maris writes:

[snipped]

> Your hypothetical of entering 11 inches in
> the new dimension, with the resampling box
> checked or unchecked, would not result in
> PS computing 11 inches x 4000 ppi.
> PS would reduce the ppi proportionately
> in either case.

Try it.  If you simply enter a new dimension in inches, the size in pixels
will increase or decrease as required to produce that dimension ... at 4000
ppi.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.