[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

["Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>]

> "Tony Terlecki" <ajt@mrps.demon.co.uk> writes:
> > > I agree...but I simply won't let this egregious misinformation be
> > > proliferated without refute ;-)
>
> > Perhaps Austin you should make up a web page detailing
> everything that has
> > been discussed here in the past and simply point people to it
> whenever you
> > consider them to have confounded technical terms. It would save a lot of
> > collective groaning everytime the subject rears its ugly head
> and may save
> a
> > few people from hitting the unsubscribe button!
>
> The web page would be nice, but I hope Austin will continue to jump on
> people.

David,

The last thing I really want to do is "jump on people".  I mean that
seriously.  I do admit I get a bit "animated" when I get
frustrated/annoyed...typically with certain specific people...but in
general, I'd like to believe I'm rather "matter of fact" about it...

> If I have my foot in my mouth (not rare; maybe something in my last
> note was dizzy, Austin?)

No, this was sufficient: "Austin is, of course, right on this one." ;-)
;-)...sorry, I couldn't resist ;-)

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body