ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Sharpening and JPEG/TIFF (was: Colorspaces for different purposes)



At 08:42 PM 6/9/2002,  wrote:
> > If this same image was used for web, you would first downsample it to
> > 72dpi, then unsharp mask it for appropriate level of crispness at that
> > resolution.
>
>While I agree with what you say, the reason for it is wrong. "72dpi" has
>no meaning for
>screen viewing. Only the pixel dimensions are relevant. Screens don't know
>"dpi" or
>"ppi". They only show pixels.

Yes, sorry; I rewrote that part and looks like left out the obvious. Should
have said: "first downsample it to the pixel dimensions you need".  --Sami

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.