ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000




> >Tris Schuler wrote:
>
> >....So far I've read not one horror story authored by a Polaroid user.
>
>Neither have I. That was another (and important) reason I finally
>decided on a Polaroid scanner, that plus the helpfulness and easy
>availability of David Hemingway, and his (and others') assurances that
>if not Polaroid Corporation itself, then at least this family of
>scanners will be around and supported for the long haul.
>
>I was all set to buy a Nikon 4000ED, but then started hearing about
>problems (many of them reported right here) with Nikon scanners and
>their LED system. The older Polaroid 4000 lacked the specs of the Nikon,
>but when the Plus model came out with equal or better specs (to say
>nothing of a $500 lower price), it was a no-brainer.
>
>And now the Polaroid 120 Plus has just been released. That should
>releive a lot of headaches for all those unhappy Nikon 8000 owners.
>
>Rodger Kingston

If they have the money, Roger, which doesn't grow on trees where I live.
Speaking for myself, I'll have to be satisfied for awhile with my poor
little SS4000.

Tris

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.