ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images



I'm not a pro by any means -- just a rank amateur having fun, but if you
believe $200 less expenses is a good wage for a photographer, I'm sure never
entering the business.  Best case, that's $25 an hour, if there were no
expenses and it was an eight hour day.  Worst case it is a 16 hour day with
thousands in expenses.

Am I missing something?

Tom

From: "Anthony Atkielski"
<snip>

Many artists can recover all their costs, and then some, on the very first
sale.
> An artist who sells a day's work for $200 doesn't need any additional
income
> from royalties.  And if he were a bricklayer, he wouldn't receive any.
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.