ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ?



The primary reason is that sRGB is a smaller color gamut than today's inkjet
printers print.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk>
To: <Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 3:39 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Why not sRGB ?


| I use AdobeRGB for scans but I do wonder if I should swap back to sRGB. I
| don't use the colour matching at all with the digicam which is roughly
sRGB.
|
| Many people on this list use Epson printers that supposedly work with
sRGB.
| If you don't use external printing services or if the external service you
| use have their printing set-up to sRGB then why not use sRGB. Everytime
you
| convert to or from one colour profile to another you have the potential to
| mess up your print. If your end target is sRGB (which includes web work)
why
| not just work in sRGB?
|
| Steve
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.