ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá

ÒÁËÅÔËÉ ÄÌÑ ÔÅÎÎÉÓÁ Head ÐÏ ÎÉÚËÉÍ ÃÅÎÁÍ











     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners




> > In fact, their typical MTBF is rated
> > for 1000
> > hours.
>       Not only is the "typical" life of LEDs far longer than what you have
> asserted,

You are right, ALL LEDs are not typically rated for 1000 hours.  The typical
was meant only for the LEDs I was referencing, not for all LEDs.  Saying
"their" was clearly  my mistake.  All I meant to point out was that there
are LEDs that have as low an MTBF as 1000 hours.

> Yes, but how did you extrapolate this into "typical" performance for
> all LEDs?

Via mistake.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.