ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)



> I was thinking color images.  Gotta remember
> that Austin (more often than not) is scanning
> BW negatives.

Yes, you are right, I am talking B&W.  I really should have said that, but
we were talking about converting RGB scans to B&W, so I assumed the source
WAS a B&W negative...

> There is a difference here between the Nikon
> scanners (at least the latest generation) and
> most others -- specifically, the Nikons
> use a 3-line *monochrome* CCD sensor, and
> tri-color (RGB) LEDs

Huh?  How do they get even illumination, muchless correct wavelength light,
from LEDs as the light source?  That wouldn't be my first choice I don't
believe, for a light source, or for filtering the light!






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.