ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: scanning/photoshop workstation (long)



OFF TOPIC

Mr Moderator, your attention please.
Out with the Kraut, that's what I say.

Richard Corbett - Gentleman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Entlich" <artistic@ampsc.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: scanning/photoshop workstation (long)


>
>
> James L. Sims wrote:
>
> > I agree that there were issues with 95, 98, and 98SE but ME was rock
solid
> > right out of the box (purchased last September).  There were issues with
device
> > drivers, and some products still do not have ME drivers, but the OS
itself is
> > rock stable - never a blue screen, ever.  I believe, with the new driver
> > architecture, Windows 2000, XP, and ME will be even better.  I'm not a
fan of
> > Microsoft but I think their operating systems are starting to mature and
I
> > think that will help those of us who use graphics.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > JimD wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Like developing a good bottle of wine, eh?  After 15-20 years of
> testing, tweaking and aging, after having to deal with many glasses
> filled with acidic, unripe, or otherwise barely palatable stuff,
> something drinkable comes onto the scene.  Just too bad MS served us all
> their failures along the way, (and charged us for them, too ;-))?
>
> Art
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.