ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: File sizes, file formats, etc. for printing 8.5 x 11and 13 x 17...



Roger,

   Without resampling QP and PS are pretty close, I think QP still does a
better job though.  It is too bad that QP does not work with Mac as I'm sure
those that have a Mac would really like the program.

Dale


> Hi Dale,
> Thanks for the tip, but I'm using a Mac G4. As it happens, I
> don't resample for printing (sorry if I gave the wrong impression).
> Along with Austin Franklin, I am also interested in how
> Qimage makes prints far superior to Photoshop. I gather from your
> first reply to Austin that it has to do with superior resampling
> algorithms, so does it also give better prints if you don't resample?
>
> Regards,
> Roger Smith





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.