[filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography

["Bob Geoghegan" <bobgeo@dgiinc.com>]

Yes, there are all sorts of ways to define the perfect comparison test
depending on what's most relevant to the way each of us would use the gear,
let alone a "perfect" lab evaluation.  Rørslett is a reliable source but
he's working with his own requirements & tastes -- a cold weather nature
photographer fond of long lenses.
Bob G

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of gary
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 9:07 PM
To: bobgeo@dgiinc.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography

I wish they were a bit more scientific in their analysis. For instance,
Canon makes more than one 300mm lens.

Bob Geoghegan wrote:
> Hmmm, 12 MP but in different sizes.  Consider the Nikon D2X(s) vs Canon 1D
> mkII or 5D.
> http://www.naturfotograf.com/D2X_rev00.html
> http://www.naturfotograf.com/D2X_rev06.html#top_page
>
> Results may vary, of course.
> Bob G

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body