Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography



I simply see no advantage to have a smaller sensor. I don't see how I
spent pixels. This makes no sense to me.

Nikon has an option on some models where you can toss the outer area of
the sensor to save space on the memory card.

R. Jackson wrote:
> Sure, but you "spend" pixels of your total sensor resolution to get
> there.
>
> On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:37 AM, gary wrote:
>
>> A cropped sensor really doesn't give you more reach. If you think
>> about
>> it, you could just crop a full size image to get more "reach."
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.