Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography



Since I have not used VueScan in years, I have to take your word on that;
but white balance/color temp is a very significant element in many cases
along with exposure that I use Camera RAW for which is not available from
within Photoshop.  But I think we are on t he same page and not really in
any major disagreement.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of R. Jackson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:10 PM
> To: laurie@advancenet.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
>
>
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Laurie@advancenet.net wrote:
>
> > most of the automatic
> > processing that is done by the scanning software has to do with
> > things that
> > one can already do in Photoshop such as levels and curves settings,
> > saturation settings, brightness and contrast settings, etc. and not
> > with
> > things that are done with Camera RAW applications.
>
> The biggest advantage to camera RAW over a scanner DNG is the ability
> to change color temperature/white balance info. The rest is pretty
> analogous to operations possible with any image in Photoshop. For
> instance, I just opened up a shot I took of fireworks last night with
> my D200. Going through the panes I can control White Balance, Temp
> and Tint. Then Exposure compensations, including brightness,
> contrast, saturation, etc. In the next pane I can control tone
> curves. In the next I can add sharpening. In the next I can convert
> to grayscale with HSL tweaks. In the next I can do split-toning with
> Highlight and Shadow controls. In the next I can correct lens
> geometry and CA. The next is camera color profiling and the final
> pane is for presets. Really, the only thing I can do with Adobe
> Camera RAW that I can't do with a DNG from VueScan is adjust the
> white balance from raw sensor data. The rest of it works just about
> the same whether I'm adjusting a scan or a NEF.
>
> -Rob
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
> title or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.