Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography

I don't have a DSLR, but wouldn't a raw camera image need to be, shall
we say, dematrixed. The output of a film scanner is RGB at every pixel
location, where the DSLR is one color per pixel, with additional post
processing required to get RGB at every location.

R. Jackson wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Laurie@advancenet.net wrote:
>> Most of the DSLRs mentioned
>> may be less than 25 megapixels but they shoot in Camera RAW
>> formats, which
>> can be adjusted in a number of ways if needed before converting the
>> Camera
>> Raw format to an interpreted value standard image format, which
>> cannot be
>> done when scanning film.
> Actually, RAW output from VueScan is pretty similar a camera RAW
> output in its ability to be manipulated in post.
> -Rob

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.