Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography
  • From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:41:34 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:40:05 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com;b=tImRiJ3s7n1g8+xpp4oiWJLnBVaQrv78upegazcoY2hEaH97caVcEGXMGPskgSPL;h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:Importance:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Envelope-to: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <46691050.9040509@lazygranch.com>
  • List-post: <mailto:filmscanners@halftone.co.uk> (No HTML, plain text only)
  • List-subscribe: <mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk> (use 'Subscribe filmscanners@halftone.co.uk')
  • List-unsubscribe: <mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk> (use 'Unsubscribe filmscanners@halftone.co.uk')
  • Thread-index: AceppvTLTZp5nms3SjGOCQJpMPXR7AAO9p0g

> From: lists@lazygranch.com
>
> My recollection is the first DSLR these guys thought was as
> good as film was a 16Mpixel Canon EOS 1. I can't recall the
> exact variant (Mark 1, mark 2, etc.) If you don't own that
> camera (or maybe the 22Mpixel model that is going to replace
> it), the DSLR will not be as good as scanned film. However,
> if you can control your work to the point where you don't
> need to crop very much, you can get acceptable results with a
> lesser camera.
>
> I attended a talk by Jim Sugar (National Geographic and other
> mags) a few months ago. I haven't followed through on this,
> but he said Getty Images and Digital Railroad have on their
> websites what they consider an acceptable camera to produce
> stock images for them to sell.

I always felt that DSLRs, even my lowly 10D, had more accurate, neutral
color than even the Kodachrome 25 I used to shoot, much more neutral than
the E6 films. When you think about it, a simple color filter into three
photon counters (which is what a silicon sensor is, effectively) is a lot
simpler, from an information processing point of view, than a pair of
reversing chemical processes, both of which have non-linearities and
interactions.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.