ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Printer drivers at 720ppi



Ditto. I printed two sharp 8X10 images of a scanned flower image, one with
no discernible parallel vertical lines. I printed one at 300 and one at 360
dpi on an Epson 2200. They were indistinguishable with a loupe.

I would agree that it seems like the data are processed during the print
process, whether the final resolution is set to a multiple of 720 or not.

Stan Schwartz


-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Roger Smith
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:32 AM
To: snsok@cox.net
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Printer drivers at 720ppi

>>I concluded from this
test that, at least for a regular photographic image (as opposed to a
test chart), there was some advantage to going above 240ppi, but not
much, especially considering the dramatically increased file sizes.

Regards,
>>Roger Smith

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.