ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Printer drivers at 720ppi




Good, I am glad you not only confirmed my recollection but elucidated on
it since I have reached an age where my memory chips may be beginning to
fade. :-)

filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk <> wrote:
> At 10:33 AM -0500 10/24/03, LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>> It is funny that you should mention the 240 figure; I also remember
>> a long sdiscussion ont he old Leben Epson Inkjet printer list in
>> which it was finally concluded that the 240 ppi/dpi number was the
>> optimum resolution to send to the printer and any files greater than
>> that were a waste of processing time and storage space since the
>> printers would reduce the resolution down to the 240 ppi/dpi and the
>> output would show only a relatively small improvement over files
>> with original resolutions of 240 ppi/dpi.  It was also said that
>> this small improvement stopped once the file resolution sent to the
>> printer went over 300 or 360 ppi/dpi.
>
>       At the risk of prolonging a rather OT discussion, I can put
> in my $.02 worth. I was one of the people from the old Leben list who
> did some printer resolution tests - printing files at 240, 300, 360
> and 353.359 ppi (the last was to determine if indeed an even multiple
> was advantageous to the printer). I tested an Epson1160 and 1270
> (both rather obsolete now, so things may have changed).
>       I examined the prints with a 4x loupe and could see a slight
> improvement from 240 to 300 and on up to 360. The 353.359 ppi print
> was identical to the 360 in terms of sharpness. I concluded from this
> test that, at least for a regular photographic image (as opposed to a
> test chart), there was some advantage to going above 240ppi, but not
> much, especially considering the dramatically increased file sizes.
>
> Regards,
> Roger Smith
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate)
> in the message title or body
>
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.