ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: 8 bit versus 16



Austin Franklin wrote:

> How do you know the original scanner data is any good?
I can tell from the smooth histogram in VueScan and the Dropper Tool in PSP.

>> A photo editing program working with 16 bit/channel and feeding
>> it with the maximum available bit-depth from the scanner would be the
>> solution.
> How do you know?
How do you know the earth is round? Do you need extra proof?

> That's nice, but show me some images that show a tonal manipulation
> problem with 8 bit color data.
No, I don't show you my kitchen. You have to do with the food I serve... :-)

> Funny enough...all you people who have this BIG problem,
It is not a BIG problem. Most images will do with 8 bit manipulation, but
some with extreme curves or white and/or black point applied have
difficulties.

If you don't believe me, I am sorry.
I you never had seen this 8 bit manipulation problem, I assume you always
have simple good snapshots to start with...


--
Regards,
Henk de Jong

http://www.hsdejong.nl/
Nepal and Burma (Myanmar) - Photo Galleries


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.