ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16



> Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > How do you know the original scanner data is any good?
> I can tell from the smooth histogram in VueScan and the
> Dropper Tool in PSP.
>
> >> A photo editing program working with 16 bit/channel and feeding it
> >> with the maximum available bit-depth from the scanner would be the
> >> solution.
> > How do you know?
> How do you know the earth is round? Do you need extra proof?
>
> > That's nice, but show me some images that show a tonal manipulation
> > problem with 8 bit color data.
> No, I don't show you my kitchen. You have to do with the food
> I serve... :-)
>
> > Funny enough...all you people who have this BIG problem,
> It is not a BIG problem. Most images will do with 8 bit
> manipulation, but some with extreme curves or white and/or
> black point applied have difficulties.
>
> If you don't believe me, I am sorry.
> I you never had seen this 8 bit manipulation problem, I
> assume you always have simple good snapshots to start with...
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Henk de Jong

Austin Franklin can be dismissed as a troll.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.