ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 8 bit versus 16



Henk,

> Most images will do with 8 bit manipulation...

Simply show me one that doesn't.

> but
> some with extreme curves or white and/or black point applied have
> difficulties.

White and/or black points applied?  ALL 8 bit images have the setpoints
applied, unless you have some weird/old scanner that only provides 8 bit
data!

> If you don't believe me, I am sorry.

Not only do I not believe you, I know what you're saying is wrong.  Again,
if someone here really wanted to shut me up about this, then provide an
image...no one has...or can.

> I you never had seen this 8 bit manipulation problem, I assume you always
> have simple good snapshots to start with...

Yes, simple snapshots with my Hasselblads...the ultimate P&S...or simply
that the "problem" doesn't exist ;-)

If you require extreme tonal curve manipulation, then I suggest you look at
getting the image "right" on film, instead of relying on your image editing
program to get it right for you after the fact.  Of course, there are some
instances where this is not possible/practical.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.