ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Scanning map question


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Scanning map question
  • From: "HPA" <tom@historicphotoarchive.com>
  • Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:09:19 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <200305292319.QAA07829@technicaladvantage.net>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I have to scan a 18x22" map to produce a SuperB 13x19 print.  Poor condition
map needs lots of work.  I am running out of size in PS7.  I want to scan as
high res as possible for retouching sake, then drop down to stitch them.  I
can scan up to 1800dpi.  The question is: what would be my final values in
'image size' when i went to stitch them together?  it would take all day to
experiment

I am scanning the map greayscale 16bit, and will make a separate scan of old
paper texture, and make final print in color for paper texture only and run
it through a second time for BO printing of map. G4, OSX.2, PS7, 1.2 gig RAM

As an alternative, i can shoot a 4x5 with a vacuum easel and scan that,
anybody have any ideas that can get this job done without spending all day
on it?  thanks

Tom Robinson

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.