Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: JPEG2000 > Paul

Robert - I am confused.  Can you tell me which implementation uses kakadu,
given you know it is fast?  I thought the fnord thing was kakadu based, but
obviously I've got it wrong somewhere.

I am currently downloading irfanview's own plug-in to compare with the
fnord one.


At 05:34 04/02/03, you wrote:
>Indeed, fnordware.com 's plug-in is very slow. Maybe because 1) he didn't
>use kakadu, 2) he did mess something up, 3) the plug-in mechanism of PS is
>slow (no idea how exactly this works). I know that kakadu is fast. On my
>machine I can compress a 53MB 24-bit image in 12 sec from HD to HD at 1:10
>resulting in a 5.3MB j2k file. On a second try it takes only 8 seconds. On a
>second try with lossless compression it takes 16 seconds resulting in a 26MB

Canberra, Australia

Satellite maps of fire situation Canberra and Snowy Montains

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.