ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re:Re: digital artifacting


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re:Re: digital artifacting
  • From: "Tim Schooler" <tschooler@cox-internet.com>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:23:11 -0600
  • In-reply-to: <20030116013257.HYME26132.fe3@wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 12:00 AM 1/16/2003 +0000, you wrote:


>Not at all. Look at the res charts. When the D60 fails to resolve, it
>returns a blur. When the SD9 fails to resolve, it returns high contrast
>incorrect data.



In either case, you have incorrect data.




>Scan provia at 4000 dpi. Crop out 2000x3000 pixles. Now aim your D60 at the
>same subject, but compose so that the 2000x3000 pixel crop fills the frame.
>Compare those. When I do that, the D60 looks better.




Been there, done that. My 8000 scanner blows away anything I get out
of my digital SLRs. That includes a D60, and an S2.


        Best Regards,

        Tim Schooler

http://www.timschooler.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.