ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Avoiding Newton rings



I think how obvious the anti-newton ring "texture" in the glass or
plastic depends on the lighting source in part, but most importantly,
the magnification ratio.  When scanning a 35mm or 6x6cm film, the
scanning resolution is 2700-4800 dpi, while I don't suspect your are
scanning a 4x5 or 8 x 10 transparency at that type of resolution (unless
you want a several gig file).

I'm unfamiliar with anti-newton ring plastic.  How thick is it?  Is it
flexible?  How do you avoid scratches and static?

Art

Tim Atherton wrote:

> using plastic/mylar type anti-newton sheets on 4x5 and 8x10 transparency
> scans on my flatbed it doesn't seem to add texture or suchlike (and the
> sheet is between the scanning head and the image). There maybe some very
> slight softening, but I've done side by side comparisons and couldn't really
> tell - but I'm sure the big neg helps.
>
> tim
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.