ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 3 year wait




> Since both people are anal retentive, at least I shouldn't get any sh*t
> on me ;-)

Arthur,

There is a difference between being anal retentive and being accurate.

> I believe what Anthony is saying is that it is rare that a 10 stop
> difference would occur in adjacent areas of an image, not that a full
> image wouldn't contain a 10 stop range of contrast.

That has already been discussed, and is not what he said, he clearly said an
image would not contain 10 stops.  David brought this up, and I agreed that
what is important, with respect to what was being discussed, was "adjacent",
not what Anthony was saying.

Please stop the snipes, even with a smiley face, they are still snipes.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.