ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Newbie question



Ah yes!

Thanks

D.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddie Cairns" <glenside@ntlworld.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Newbie question


> Because the 2200 was only 600 dpi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tourtelot" <tourtelot1@attbi.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:22 PM
> Subject: filmscanners: Newbie questiond
>
> > Any reason why I would find the Umax Astra 4450 a better choice than the
> > discontinued but, by some, highly regarded (and cheap) 2200 any better
as
> a
> > low-priced 1200 film scanner?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Douglas Tourtelot, CAS
> > Seattle, WA
> > tourtelot1@attbi.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.