Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000



> I had the same focus issues with my 8000 although I did not know it at the
> time.  When I replaced it with a drum scanner and compared scans (120
film)
> from the drum to those from the 8000, I discovered that the nikon scans
were
> not sharp to the edges.  When viewed by themselves, the nikon scans looked
> pretty good but when viewed side by side with howtek scans, the difference
> was obvious.  I imagine that the nikon glass holders would have solved
that
> nicely.  For the money, if you get one that works correctly for you, the
> 8000's are amazing units...

I've had this problem with about 30% of the images I scan with the 8000.
Most of the problem images are unmounted single-frame 120 transparencies.
For these the glass holder does work rather well, with no negative impact on
the images that I can see. The glass holder is rather expensive though, and
really, it's something that should be shipped in the 8000 box.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.