Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Ls-4000ED vs. FS-4000 - can you help?

At 1:22 PM +0200 13-10-01, Tomasz Zakrzewski wrote:
>I'm trying to find some "substitute" for the next 12-24

BF: When I buy for the short term sometimes I buy the cheaper alternative.

>I've narrowed my choice to
>Nikon LS-4000ED ($ 2100) and Canon FS-4000 ($ 950).

>- According to test in German "Color Foto" magazine when scanning b&w
>negatives, the LS-4000ED suffers from the so called Callier-Quiotent.

BF: I've been able to pull a reasonable amount of detail out of very 
dense Kodachrome slides, although a drum scanner could do better. 
I'm just beginning to experiment with B/W, beginning with some old 
Tri-X negatives.  So far the dynamic range and Dmax seem just fine.

BF: One thing about this scanner is that it takes minor surface 
scratches, such as those produced by film processing rollers, and 
turns them into major artifacts in the scans.  For color negatives 
ICE does a miraculous job of getting rid of them, but it doesn't work 
on (silver halide) B/W.  Scans with 200 ASA Kodak color negatives 
show a strongly pronounced grain that tolerates only minimal 
sharpening, but the GEM grain enhancement does an excellent job of 
reducing the grain and making the scans take sharpening quite well.

>- How is it with unsharp edges of film material scanned with LS-4000ED...

BF: With some of my 20-year old Kodachromes on my new LS-4000ED I 
find that there is noticeable blurring in the corners with the 
default focus point (at the center).  If I move the focus point 
halfway between the center and corner, then both areas become 
slightly out of focus such that the sharpness is no better than that 
of my old 2400dpi film scanner (Minolta Dimage Scan Dual).

>- Has anybody compared the optical quality of FS-4000 and LS-4000ED?

BF: I compared scans of the face on Kodak Q60 calibration targets 
from the Canon FS-4000 and Nikon LS-4000ED and observed that the 
Canon has a finer grain and slightly sharper image, while the Nikon 
has better detail and less noise in deep shadows.

>Can you
>tell how does the Canon scanner perform without the FilmGet software which
>apparently performs unswitchable sharpening with all the scans?

BF: Take a look at www.normankoren.com.  Norman just got a Canon 
FS-4000 and he's very fussy about sharpness.

>- Is the Dmax of FS-4000 (2,9 according to "Color Foto") sufficient for

BF: I would think that this would be acceptable for most negatives.

Hope this helps,


Bill Fernandez  *  User Interface Architect  *  Bill Fernandez Design

(505) 346-3080  *  bill@billfernandez.com  *  http://billfernandez.com


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.