ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Bruce Fraser Reviews Nikon 4000ED



I'm not at all hostile to the 4000 ED. It's just a piece of gear.

I used a LS-2000 for a few years and found it to be very effective. I'm sure
the 4000 ED is an improvement. Bruce likes it; I think... ? I couldn't tell
from his review! 

My intention was primarily to challenge someone else's comment about the
Creative Pro article being a good review. I thought others would be more
interested in my position if I backed it up with some thoughts and
observations.

Wire

on 10/3/01 1:16 PM, PAUL GRAHAM at peegee@btinternet.com wrote:

> I've read both his comments and Wire Moores, and the truth is somewhere in
> between. his are written for a major magazine readership, yours, if you will
> excuse me, seem quite hostile to the 4000.
> 
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.