Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: brandnew user queries



In my opinion you better off scanning the film - you will let more detail,
even such as doesn't show up in the prints, and the flatbed will have the
same sharpness-blurring effect as the filmscanner.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Lewiston" <dlewistn@maui.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:29 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: brandnew user queries

[snipped]


| Perhaps I should rent a really excellent flatbed to scan these
| prints, rather than make do with slide scans which lose the ultrafine
| detail. Do you recall the list's consensus on the best flatbeds? I realise
| that it will take two passes per image with stitching to join them.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.