ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!




> As I think I've posted before, I did a double blind shoot out with Leica
> and Nikon lenses (a 28mm 2.8 wide angle, a 135mm 2.8 tele and the 50mm
> 1.4 normal).  Each image was shot with one of these three lenses with
> both the Leica and the Nikon, on Kodachrome 25.
> 
> After the images were marked, they were placed in slide trays in random
> sequence, but next to one another, and projected with Navitar Gold
> projector lenses.
> 
> A group of 4 experienced photographers were asked to evaluate each pair
> of images and choose the one they preferred.  Consideration as given to
> sharpness, color "accuracy", overall contrast and exposure evenness, and
> the like.

Is doing this type of testing with projected slides really a "good" test?




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.