ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows




----- Original Message -----
From: "John Matturri" <jmatturr@earthlink.net>
To: "filmscanners@halftone.co.uk" <Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows


| I've been having good results using Supra 400 (SS4000, Vuescan, current
| 7.1.7) except for the noise-like areas in dark parts of the image. At
| times I can partially compensate for this by setting the black point but
| only at the cost of losing shadow detail that at times is needed for the
| image (and often still not really getting an adequately clean shadow
| areas). Any suggestions about how best to deal with this problem?

Keep the shadow detail and deal with it in post-scan processing with
Photoshop or you software of choice.

| If push comes to shove and I really need to use an image with this
| problem can I be more or less confident that a drum scan would solve the
| problem?

I don't know - hopefully someone else can answer.

Maris




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.