Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Nikon Service
At 09:37 PM 7/17/01 -0700, Art wrote:
>>From my read on this,
I don't give a rat's ass about your observations
on this topic, Art. I can browse the internet as
well as the next Tom, Dick or Harry, and don't need
your help to form my opinions on such matters.
Have you owned a Nikon scanner? Have you ever
used one? Have you ever scanned one of your images
in a Nikon scanner? Have you personally dealt with
Nikon technical support in any manner, ever?
>their service is at least equally as bad, while
>costing more, as do their scanners. Further, they tend to maintain an
>arrogant attitude about consumer complaints when the repairs are not up
Again: how does Nikon compare to other brands,
offering similar products, on any of these
matters? THAT is the question. Not Art
Entlich's unfounded opinions, based on his
tea-leaf interpretation of internet posts.
>If you think my comment is inaccurate, feel free to spend your time
>proving otherwise, and report back to us.
Bullsh*t, Art. You made one of your many
unfounded, accusatory, broad-brush statements
about Brand X. It's clear that you haven't
any facts to back up your accusations, vis-a-vis
Nikon's record, as compared to any other brand.
It's not my job to refute your unfounded
statements. You made the statement; YOU
provide the facts to back them up.
Can't cite facts? The give it up. Find something
else to talk about.