Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?



You're in Dan Margulis's camp, then?  He maintains (and I have no opinion
one way or the other) that 16-bit color are not necessary.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "rafeb" <rafeb@channel1.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?


| At 10:13 AM 7/14/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
|
| >Nikonscan 3.1 seems to work fine on my system, no crashes.  Having said
that
| >I don't use it because the scans come out posterised in comparison to
| >Vuescan output because Nikonscan only works with 8 bits of data from the
| >LS30.  This shouldn't be an issue with newer Nikon scanners.
|
|
| I've been making scans in 24-bit color for years, on
| about 3 or 4 different film scanners.  I don't use
| the 48-bit color mode, ever, even on the 8000.
|
| No posterization.  I suspect there's another reason
| for the posterization you're seeing.
|
|
| rafe b.
|
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.