Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Rafe, you are right on the money.
----- Original Message -----
From: Raphael Bustin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Lynn Allen wrote:
> > Is the criticism valid? Yeah, it is. And it's fixable, too. Have I
> > anybody trying to do so, lately? Nuh-uh. AFAIC, the mfgrs are just
> > to deep to be competitive--they're cutting the product, cutting
> > and ultimately cutting themselves, IMHO.
> With all due respect, Lynn -- your comments,
> while valid (as usual) are beside the point.
> I could, if I chose to, indulge in all sorts
> of brand-bashing. I've tried to stay on good
> behavior and avoid that. It serves no purpose.
> Whatever my issues may be with Nikon --
> and I've been very blunt about them --
> I've learned nothing on this list that
> will help me deal with those issues.
> Where I've discovered problems with my
> Nikon, and subsequent workarounds, I've
> shared this knowledge with the list.
> A discussion on technical merits is
> what I expect. Recitations of unfounded,
> inflammatory opinions, alleged regional
> allegiances, pop-psychology and broad
> generalizations serve no useful purpose.
> rafe b.