ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0





On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Lynn Allen wrote:

> Is the criticism valid? Yeah, it is. And it's fixable, too. Have I seen 
> anybody trying to do so, lately? Nuh-uh. AFAIC, the mfgrs are just cutting 
> to deep to be competitive--they're cutting the product, cutting the user, 
> and ultimately cutting themselves, IMHO.


With all due respect, Lynn -- your comments, 
while valid (as usual) are beside the point.

I could, if I chose to, indulge in all sorts 
of brand-bashing.  I've tried to stay on good 
behavior and avoid that.  It serves no purpose.

Whatever my issues may be with Nikon -- 
and I've been very blunt about them -- 
I've learned nothing on this list that 
will help me deal with those issues.

Where I've discovered problems with my 
Nikon, and subsequent workarounds, I've 
shared this knowledge with the list.

A discussion on technical merits is 
what I expect. Recitations of unfounded, 
inflammatory opinions, alleged regional 
allegiances, pop-psychology and broad 
generalizations serve no useful purpose.


rafe b.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.