Im using the Fuji lab daily. After scanning my work, putting the tif
picture on a cd-r to the customer I send via e-mail a jpg file and get
superb cheap ( 25 cent ] 10 x 15 cm copies to give away to they who have
participate.
The lab profile is almost 100% correct against my scannned pictures.
Mikael Risedal
Photographer
Lund Sweden
>From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?
>Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:51:20 -0500
>
>Because the inkjet is at home or at the office and we have to go out to the
>lab. And because we may not like the first print and can tweak it to print
>again (and again and again?). And because our color settings within the
>image, the "numbers", may not work well in the minilab.
>
>Maris
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tomasz Zakrzewski" <tomzakrz@ka.onet.pl>
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:14 PM
>Subject: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?
>
>
>| Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures.
>| Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier?
>| Great quality, 300dpi, up to 22x13,7", archival quality (especially on
>Fuji
>| Crystal Archive Paper) and last but not last photographic paper.
>|
>| I will read your answers with great interest.
>|
>| Tomasz Zakrzewski
>|
>|
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at .
